India's National Medical Commission (NMC) has given in-principle approval to replace the percentile-based scoring system with a rank-based merit system for NEET-PG and NEET-SS entrance exams. Under the new approach, only ranks will be announced in results, not percentile scores. The Indian Medical Association (IMA) has welcomed the shift but raised a critical concern: that simply changing the scoring method will not solve the deeper problem of vacant postgraduate seats and the pressure to lower academic standards. For NEET-PG aspirants, this change affects how your exam performance will be reported and potentially how counselling cutoffs are set.
NEET-PG and NEET-SS will move from percentile-based to rank-based scoring, but doctors warn this alone won't fix the real issue of unfilled PG seats and declining merit standards.
Your matched MD/MS/DNB seats
LockedEnter your NEET-PG rank to unlock the real colleges you can get — All India Quota and state — with closing ranks, fees and stipend.
Unlock My College ListWhat Is Changing: From Percentile to Rank-Based Scoring
The NMC has approved a shift in how NEET-PG and NEET-SS results will be reported. Currently, candidates receive a percentile score—a measure of how your performance compares to all other test-takers. Under the new system, only your rank (your position in the merit order) will be disclosed. This is a significant change in how your exam outcome is communicated and understood.
The proposed system is part of recommendations made by a 12-member expert committee to the Supreme Court. The goal is to reduce delays during the counselling phase and ensure the admission process is completed within the scheduled academic calendar. However, the new rules still need to be formally notified by the NMC, and draft regulations are expected to be released for stakeholder consultation before final implementation.
Why Doctors Welcome the Change—But With Caution
The Indian Medical Association has publicly supported the move to a rank-based system. However, their support comes with a strong caveat: they emphasize that merit, minimum academic standards, and patient safety must never be compromised. The IMA's president, Dr. Anil Kumar J. Nayak, stated that the purpose of medical education is not simply to fill seats, but to train skilled specialists who are responsible for saving lives.
The association's message is clear: a change in scoring format alone will not address the underlying problems that have led to vacant PG seats and repeated cuts to the percentile threshold for eligibility. Doctors are concerned that without addressing root causes, the new system could still be used as a tool to admit candidates who do not meet true merit standards, simply to fill empty positions.
The Real Problem: Why PG Seats Remain Empty
Know the exact MD/MS/DNB seats your rank can get
Official round-wise closing ranks with fee and stipend, matched to your rank.
Behind the push for a new scoring system lies a persistent issue: many postgraduate medical seats across India remain unfilled each year. Rather than lowering eligibility standards to fill these vacancies, the IMA argues that the root causes must be identified and addressed. According to Dr. Piyush Jain, the IMA's finance secretary, these causes include excessive fees charged by private institutions, inadequate infrastructure, shortage of faculty members, unequal stipends across colleges, and poor working conditions in certain specialties.
The association's position is that every PG seat should be filled through a fair process, but never at the cost of merit, medical competence, or patient safety. This reflects a broader concern in the medical community that simply changing how scores are reported will not solve the structural and financial barriers that make many PG positions unattractive to qualified candidates.
- Excessive fees at private medical colleges
- Inadequate infrastructure and facilities
- Shortage of qualified faculty members
- Unequal or low stipends across institutions
- Poor working conditions in certain specialties
What This Means for NEET-PG Aspirants: Practical Implications
For an MBBS doctor preparing for NEET-PG, the shift to rank-based scoring is primarily a reporting change. Instead of seeing your percentile (e.g., 95th percentile), you will see your rank (e.g., rank 500 out of 100,000 candidates). This does not change how competitive the exam is or how your performance is evaluated—it only changes how that performance is communicated.
The more important implication is for counselling and seat allocation. Counselling cutoffs, which determine which colleges and specialties you are eligible for, are currently set using percentile thresholds. With a rank-based system, these cutoffs will be expressed as rank ranges instead. This could make the counselling process more transparent and easier to understand, as ranks are absolute positions rather than relative percentages. However, the underlying competitiveness of the exam and the difficulty of securing a seat in a top college or preferred specialty will remain unchanged.
Concerns About Lowering Merit Standards to Fill Seats
One of the IMA's key concerns is that the percentile cutoff for NEET-PG eligibility has been repeatedly lowered in recent years to fill vacant seats. In some cases, candidates with very low or even negative scores have been admitted. The association warns that simply switching to a rank-based system will not prevent this practice if the underlying pressure to fill seats remains.
The IMA's message to policymakers is that the solution is not to relax standards, but to investigate why seats are empty in the first place. If a PG position remains unfilled, it may indicate that the college, specialty, or working conditions are genuinely unattractive—and that is a problem to be solved through reform, not by admitting less-qualified candidates. This distinction is crucial for maintaining the quality and safety of postgraduate medical training in India.
Every kind of PG seat, one rank
See the real seats your NEET-PG rank can reach.
Timeline and Next Steps: When Will This Take Effect?
The NMC has given in-principle approval to the rank-based system, but formal implementation is not yet complete. The proposed rules must still be notified through official NMC regulations. Draft rules are expected to be released for consultation with stakeholders—including medical colleges, doctors' associations, and the public—before final notification.
NEET-PG aspirants should monitor official NMC announcements for updates on when this change will be implemented. It is possible that the new system could be introduced for NEET-PG 2027 or later, depending on the timeline for rule notification and stakeholder feedback. Until then, the current percentile-based system remains in effect.
How Rank-Based Scoring Differs From Percentile: A Clarification
Many aspirants confuse percentile and rank, so it is worth clarifying the difference. A percentile tells you what percentage of test-takers scored below you (e.g., 95th percentile means 95% of candidates scored lower). A rank tells you your exact position in the merit order (e.g., rank 500 means you are the 500th highest scorer). Percentiles can vary depending on the total number of candidates and the distribution of scores; ranks are absolute.
For counselling purposes, rank-based cutoffs are often clearer and more stable year to year, because they are not affected by fluctuations in the number of candidates or the difficulty of the exam. This is one reason the expert committee recommended the shift. However, from an aspirant's perspective, what matters most is your position relative to others—and that is captured by both percentile and rank, just expressed differently.
The Broader Context: Supreme Court Recommendations and Exam Delays
The rank-based system is part of a larger set of recommendations made by a 12-member expert committee to India's Supreme Court. The committee was tasked with addressing delays and inefficiencies in the NEET-PG and NEET-SS counselling process. One of the key findings was that the current percentile-based system, combined with repeated cutoff adjustments, was contributing to delays in finalizing results and beginning counselling.
By moving to a rank-based system, the NMC hopes to streamline the process and ensure that counselling can begin on schedule, allowing candidates to join their chosen colleges within the academic calendar. This is a procedural improvement aimed at reducing the gap between exam completion and seat allocation—a gap that has sometimes stretched for months, leaving candidates in uncertainty.
See the exact MD/MS/DNB seats your NEET-PG rank can get
Free 2-minute preview — round-wise closing ranks, fees and stipend for every seat your rank can reach.
See My CollegesFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between percentile and rank in NEET-PG scoring?
Percentile shows what percentage of candidates scored below you (e.g., 95th percentile = 95% scored lower). Rank shows your exact position in the merit order (e.g., rank 500 = you are the 500th highest scorer). The new system will report only rank, not percentile. Both convey your relative performance, but rank is an absolute position while percentile is relative to the candidate pool.
When will the rank-based system be implemented for NEET-PG?
The NMC has given in-principle approval, but the system is not yet formally notified. Draft rules must be released for stakeholder consultation before final implementation. It is likely to take effect for NEET-PG 2027 or later. Aspirants should monitor official NMC announcements for the exact timeline.
Will the rank-based system make it easier to get into a PG college?
No. The change is in how scores are reported, not in how competitive the exam is or how seats are allocated. The underlying difficulty and competitiveness of NEET-PG will remain the same. Counselling cutoffs will be expressed as rank ranges instead of percentile ranges, but the number of available seats and the merit-based selection process will not change.
Why are doctors concerned about the new system if it is just a reporting change?
Doctors are not opposed to the rank-based system itself. Their concern is that simply changing the scoring format will not solve the real problem: vacant PG seats and pressure to lower merit standards to fill them. The IMA warns that without addressing root causes (high fees, poor infrastructure, low stipends, etc.), the new system could still be misused to admit less-qualified candidates.
What does the IMA say about lowering eligibility standards to fill PG seats?
The IMA strongly opposes lowering merit standards to fill vacant seats. They argue that if a PG position remains empty, the solution is to investigate and fix the underlying problems (fees, infrastructure, working conditions), not to admit less-qualified candidates. The IMA's president emphasized that medical education must prioritize patient safety and the quality of training, not just seat occupancy.
How will counselling cutoffs change under the rank-based system?
Currently, counselling cutoffs are set using percentile thresholds (e.g., 'minimum 50th percentile required'). Under the rank-based system, cutoffs will be expressed as rank ranges (e.g., 'ranks 1–5000 eligible for this college'). This should make cutoffs clearer and more stable year to year, as ranks are not affected by fluctuations in candidate numbers or exam difficulty.
Will the rank-based system reduce delays in NEET-PG counselling?
That is one of the goals. The expert committee recommended the shift partly to streamline the counselling process and ensure it begins on schedule within the academic calendar. By using ranks instead of percentiles, the NMC hopes to avoid delays caused by repeated cutoff adjustments and percentile calculations.
What are the main reasons PG seats remain vacant in India?
According to the IMA, vacant seats are due to: excessive fees at private colleges, inadequate infrastructure, shortage of faculty, unequal or low stipends, and poor working conditions in certain specialties. The IMA argues these structural issues must be addressed, rather than lowering admission standards to fill seats.
The shift to rank-based scoring for NEET-PG and NEET-SS is a procedural improvement aimed at clarity and efficiency, but it is not a solution to the deeper issue of vacant seats and declining standards. As an aspirant, focus on your preparation and merit—the competitiveness of the exam will not change. Monitor official NMC announcements for the exact implementation date and how counselling cutoffs will be expressed under the new system.
Plan your admission with free AI tools
Turn your NEET score into a rank, then into the exact colleges you can get.