The Andhra Pradesh High Court has issued a landmark order on 17 October 2026 directing the Sports Authority of Andhra Pradesh (SAAP) to revise the final merit list for MBBS and BDS admissions under the Sports and Games quota for 2026–27. The court ruled that a candidate who won third place in the 42nd Junior National Softball Championship must be reconsidered for admission, even though the Softball Association of Andhra Pradesh had its recognition temporarily withdrawn by SAAP. The court found that the candidate's sports certificates were issued when the association was validly recognised, and the later withdrawal of recognition should not penalise the candidate. This order affects how SAAP evaluates sports quota eligibility and may result in changes to the final priority list and seat allotments.
The High Court has directed SAAP to reconsider a sports quota candidate's eligibility based on valid championship certificates issued before the association's recognition was withdrawn, potentially revising the final merit list.
Your matched MBBS & BDS colleges
LockedEnter your NEET rank to unlock the real colleges you can get — All India Quota and every state — with official closing ranks and fees.
Unlock My College ListWhat This Order Means for Sports Quota Candidates
On 17 October 2026, the Andhra Pradesh High Court passed an order in Writ Petition No. 30921/2026 that directly affects how SAAP evaluates sports quota applications for MBBS and BDS admission in 2026–27. The court ruled that a candidate who participated in a national-level championship and won a medal cannot be rejected simply because the sports association that issued the participation certificate later had its recognition withdrawn by SAAP.
The specific case involved a softball player who represented Andhra Pradesh at the 42nd Junior National Softball Championship held in Nandyal, Kurnool District from 6 to 10 October 2024, where the candidate secured third place. The candidate was issued participation certificates by SAAP at that time. However, when the candidate applied for MBBS admission under the sports quota in 2026, SAAP initially marked the candidate as ineligible because the Softball Association of Andhra Pradesh had its recognition withdrawn on 20 January 2025.
The High Court found this reasoning flawed. The court observed that the certificates were issued when the association's recognition was valid and in force. The subsequent withdrawal of recognition should not retroactively invalidate certificates that were legitimately issued. The court directed SAAP to issue a revised final merit list that considers the candidate's championship certificate on its merits, without being influenced by the later withdrawal of the association's recognition.
Why the Association's Recognition Was Withdrawn
The Softball Association of Andhra Pradesh had its recognition renewed by SAAP until 31 December 2024. However, on 20 January 2025, SAAP withdrew the association's recognition following allegations that a person had obtained a fake certificate relating to the 43rd Senior National Softball Championship held in December 2021 and had used that fake certificate to secure public employment.
Upon discovery of this alleged irregularity, SAAP immediately withdrew the association's recognition. However, the High Court noted that this withdrawal was temporary and for a limited period. SAAP subsequently renewed the association's recognition for the year 2026, indicating that the withdrawal was not permanent.
The key legal principle the court applied is that a candidate should not suffer for administrative actions taken by authorities after the candidate has already earned and received legitimate certificates. The candidate in this case participated in the championship and received certificates when everything was in order. The later discovery of fraud by someone else, and the resulting withdrawal of recognition, should not erase the candidate's legitimate achievement.
Know the exact MBBS/BDS colleges your rank can get
Official 2023–2025 closing ranks and fees, matched to your rank.
The Court's Reasoning and Legal Precedent
The High Court relied on a Supreme Court judgment in S. Krishna Sradha v. State of Andhra Pradesh to guide its decision. That judgment established that under exceptional circumstances, if a candidate has pursued their legal right expeditiously without delay and there is fault only on the part of the authorities (not the candidate), and if there is an apparent breach of rules and regulations that would violate the right to equality and equal treatment, the court may grant relief.
The court noted that the petitioner (the softball player) had approached the authorities within a reasonable time, filed objections when called for, and uploaded objections to the university website. There was no undue delay on the candidate's part. The fault lay entirely with SAAP's decision to reject the candidate based on the association's recognition status, rather than evaluating the candidate's certificates on their own merit.
The court also observed that a similar candidate (Badagala Kethan) in a baseball case had faced the same issue and was granted relief in Writ Petition No. 28876 of 2026. The court found no distinction between that case and the present one—both candidates participated in the same sport (though different disciplines), represented the association and the state, and relied on certificates issued by the same association. Consistency in judicial treatment required the same relief in this case.
What SAAP Must Do Now
SAAP has been directed to issue a revised final merit list for the Sports and Games quota after reconsidering the candidate's case. The authority must evaluate the candidate's championship certificate without being influenced by the fact that the Softball Association of Andhra Pradesh had its recognition withdrawn for some period.
The respondents (SAAP, NTR University of Health Sciences, and the state) must consider the case on its merits and issue the final merit list accordingly by passing appropriate orders. If, after this reconsideration, SAAP concludes that the candidate deserves consideration for admission, the candidate must be given a seat under the Sports and Games quota in accordance with the priority assigned and the candidate's merit.
The court emphasised that if SAAP decides to grant admission to the candidate, it must follow the principle laid down in the S. Krishna Sradha judgment. Under that principle, in exceptional circumstances, the court may direct admission by increasing seats, but such increase should not exceed one or two seats. Any such admission must be ordered within a reasonable time (within one month from the cut-off date of 30 September) and under no circumstances beyond 30 October of the same year.
Important: The Court's Caveat on Cancellation of Other Admissions
The court acknowledged that the admission process has already progressed and that revising the final priority list could affect other candidates. However, the court made clear that if SAAP's reconsideration results in the candidate being granted admission, and if this means that a candidate at the bottom of the merit list in the same category would lose their seat, the court may pass an order cancelling that other candidate's admission—but only after giving that student a full opportunity to be heard.
This is an important safeguard: no candidate's admission will be cancelled without their knowledge or without a chance to present their case. The court will not allow one candidate to be harmed without due process, even if another candidate is being granted relief. This principle protects the interests of all candidates in the sports quota category.
Every kind of MBBS/BDS seat, one rank
See the real seats your NEET rank can reach.
What This Means for Other Sports Quota Candidates
This order sets a precedent for how SAAP must evaluate sports quota applications going forward. Any candidate who has legitimate championship certificates issued by a recognised association at the time of participation cannot be rejected simply because that association later had its recognition withdrawn for reasons unrelated to the candidate's performance.
Candidates in similar situations—where they earned certificates from an association that was later de-recognised—should now have their cases reconsidered. The key factors the court will examine are: (1) whether the certificate was issued when the association was validly recognised, (2) whether the candidate participated in a legitimate championship, (3) whether the candidate approached the authorities promptly and without undue delay, and (4) whether the candidate's rejection was based on administrative action by authorities rather than any fault of the candidate.
However, this does not mean that all candidates rejected for sports quota eligibility will automatically be admitted. Each case will be evaluated on its individual merits. The court's order applies specifically to candidates whose certificates were legitimately issued but whose eligibility was questioned due to subsequent withdrawal of the issuing association's recognition.
Timeline of Events
Understanding the sequence of events is crucial to understanding why the court ruled in the candidate's favour. The candidate participated in the 42nd Junior National Softball Championship from 6 to 10 October 2024, when the Softball Association of Andhra Pradesh was fully recognised by SAAP. The candidate won third place and received participation certificates from SAAP.
The candidate then appeared for the NEET-UG 2026 examination and secured AIR 2,39,593. After securing this rank, the candidate applied for admission to MBBS under the sports quota. On 31 August 2026, the candidate appeared for physical verification of documents and a physical skill test. The University published a tentative priority list based on the particulars furnished by SAAP, and the candidate was placed at Serial No. 30.
However, in the remarks column of the tentative priority list, it was noted that the candidate was ineligible because the Softball Association of Andhra Pradesh was not recognised by SAAP. The candidate submitted a grievance petition on 3 October 2026, pointing out that the withdrawal of recognition had nothing to do with the candidate's participation and that the certificates were already issued. SAAP did not consider this objection and maintained its position in the tentative priority list. The candidate then approached the High Court on 17 October 2026, and the court passed the order on the same day.
The Broader Legal Principle: No Retroactive Penalty
The court's order is based on a fundamental principle of administrative law: a candidate cannot be penalised for actions taken by authorities after the candidate has already earned and received legitimate credentials. This principle protects candidates from arbitrary administrative decisions that are beyond their control.
In this case, the candidate did everything right. The candidate participated in a championship when the association was recognised, earned a medal, received certificates, and then applied for admission. The candidate had no control over SAAP's decision to withdraw the association's recognition months later. To reject the candidate based on this withdrawal would be to punish the candidate for something the candidate did not do and could not have prevented.
This principle is especially important in the context of sports quota admissions, where candidates often have limited control over the administrative status of the associations that issue their certificates. The court's order ensures that candidates are evaluated fairly based on their actual achievements, not on the administrative status of the issuing body at the time of application.
See the exact MBBS colleges your NEET rank can get
Free 2-minute preview — official closing ranks and fees for every seat your rank can reach, All India and your state.
See My CollegesFrequently asked questions
Will this court order change the final merit list for sports quota admissions in Andhra Pradesh?
Yes, potentially. The court has directed SAAP to issue a revised final merit list after reconsidering the candidate's case on its merits. If SAAP concludes that the candidate deserves consideration, the candidate will be included in the revised list, which may result in changes to the priority order and seat allotments. However, the exact impact depends on SAAP's reconsideration and the final decision.
Can a candidate be rejected for sports quota admission if their association's recognition was withdrawn after they earned their certificate?
No, according to this court order. A candidate cannot be rejected simply because the association that issued their certificate later had its recognition withdrawn. The certificate must be evaluated based on whether it was legitimately issued when the association was recognised at the time of participation. The subsequent withdrawal of recognition should not retroactively invalidate the certificate.
What if I have a sports certificate from an association that is no longer recognised by SAAP?
You should check when your certificate was issued. If it was issued when the association was validly recognised by SAAP, you may have grounds to challenge a rejection based on the association's current non-recognition status. You should file a grievance with the university or approach the High Court if your objection is not considered. This court order supports candidates in your situation.
Does this order mean all rejected sports quota candidates will be admitted?
No. This order applies specifically to candidates whose certificates were legitimately issued by a recognised association but whose eligibility was questioned due to subsequent withdrawal of the association's recognition. Other candidates rejected for different reasons (such as not meeting eligibility criteria, not participating in recognised championships, or not submitting required documents) are not automatically covered by this order.
What is the deadline for SAAP to issue the revised merit list?
The court order does not specify an exact deadline for issuing the revised merit list. However, the court emphasised that any admission granted as a result of this reconsideration must be ordered within a reasonable time (within one month from the cut-off date of 30 September) and under no circumstances beyond 30 October of the same year. SAAP should act promptly to comply with the court's direction.
If the revised merit list results in my seat being cancelled, will I be given a chance to respond?
Yes. The court explicitly stated that if a candidate's admission is to be cancelled to make room for the candidate being granted relief, that candidate must be given a full opportunity to be heard before the cancellation is finalised. No admission will be cancelled without due process.
Does this order apply only to softball players or to all sports?
The order applies to all sports quota candidates in a similar situation. The court noted that a similar candidate in a baseball case (Badagala Kethan) had already been granted relief in a separate writ petition. The principle is that any candidate whose legitimate sports certificate was issued by a recognised association should not be rejected based on the association's later de-recognition.
What should I do if I believe I am in a similar situation to the candidate in this case?
First, check whether your sports certificate was issued when the association was validly recognised by SAAP. If yes, and if you have been rejected based on the association's current non-recognition status, file a grievance with the university immediately. If the grievance is not considered, you may approach the High Court. This court order supports your case if you meet these conditions.
Can SAAP appeal this High Court order?
The document does not indicate whether SAAP has appealed or plans to appeal this order. However, SAAP is bound by the High Court's direction and must comply with the order by reconsidering the candidate's case and issuing a revised merit list. Any appeal would be a separate legal proceeding.
Will this order affect the counselling schedule for sports quota admissions?
The court order does not specify changes to the counselling schedule. However, since the final merit list may be revised, there could be delays in the counselling process. Candidates should monitor updates from NTRUHS and SAAP regarding any changes to the counselling dates and procedures.
SAAP and NTR University of Health Sciences must now issue a revised final merit list for the Sports and Games quota after reconsidering the candidate's case on its merits, without being influenced by the association's recognition withdrawal. If you believe you are in a similar situation—with legitimate sports certificates issued when an association was recognised but now facing rejection due to the association's de-recognition—file a grievance immediately with the university and monitor the revised merit list when it is released. The court has set a clear precedent that candidates cannot be penalised for administrative actions taken by authorities after the candidate has already earned legitimate credentials.
Plan your admission with free AI tools
Turn your NEET score into a rank, then into the exact colleges you can get.